Non-Specific Observations of the Energy Markets

This is a picture of the incredibly tight correlation between the price of wholesale gasoline and the yields on 10-year U.S. Treasury Bonds. I've suggested before that this may be due to the fact that unleaded gasoline is a perishable commodity and thus its supply is most tightly coupled to the short-term economic outlook, but I don't know. It's interesting though, no?












This is a picture of KOL, an ETF comprised of coal related companies. Though most markets are exhibiting classic technical analysis resistance patterns, this chart wins the award for pristine textbook example. (If your new to T.A. here's a hint... ignore the bullshit. All you need to know are 'Resistance can become Support', the Head and Shoulders formation (on long-term charts only) and 50 & 200 day moving averages. Everything else is worthless.)

By the way, maps show you where to go. Charts show you where not to go. This is important.

Anyway... the consumption of coal has sky-rocketed this year relative to oil because it is a much cheaper alternative. There are some posts on my favorite economics blog, gregor.com, related to this subject which are excellent for both the quality and inventiveness of Mr. Macdonalds' writing and the accompanying charts. In addition to his theories on our current inflationary depression ("compartflation,") today he made the bold and sensible prediction that, "It was only 55 years ago that the world crossed over to use more oil than coal. In another five years, we will be going back to coal." Here is a link to a post of his with jaw dropping charts of recent trends in world coal consumption.

[btw/fyi... Gregor Macdonald, George Cooper, Satyajit Das, Bill Gross, and Mr. Soros (back in his prime)... the smartest guys in the proverbial room]

Missed Connections

A few thoughts on the State of the Union address. Not on what Obama said, but on what he didn't say and perhaps should have mentioned:

1) "The dollar is much stronger now then it was before I became recognized as a viable candidate for president... in fact, almost to the day of my speech at the Brandenburg Gate."

(Not that this is necessarily a good thing, or necessarily indicative of a casual relationship... though I personally believe that in the midst of the Freddie and Fannie nationalization of July 2008, Obama's appearance on the world stage marshaled confidence in the Dollar, which immediately began to pull forward against all other currencies. This was in no small part a consequence of the stamp of imprimatur bestowed by Paul Volcker's early presence on Obama's economics team... Conveyed correctly, the above statement could have been the most positive populist thing he could have said to the "American people" as they, a bit bullheadedly, really favor a strong dollar. It's simply patriotic chauvinism.)

[Incidentally, the so called "Palin effect" in the first three weeks of her candidacy on John McCain's rising poll numbers was I believe due instead to Obama's initial effect on the dollar. Dollar strength knocked the wind out of commodity prices and gasoline prices came rapidly down. This caused the widespread elation for a moment, as it seemed (to the uninitiated) that the "economy" was getting better. Of course, in short order the tail began to wag the dog as falling demand began a collapse in commodity prices which amplified the dollars surge. And then Lehman... and McCain/Palin was history. Flight to safety, indeed.]

2) "This trillion dollars I have spent since taking office is largely in line (proportionally) with the total amount spent by Europe to combat the panic and as such we are no worse off fiscally on a relative basis."

(Also a brief explanation of what an overnight shift in household savings from -2% of GDP to +6% of GDP does to an economy, along with an explanation of why only government spending can make up for the shock of such a sudden chasm in consumption... Yeah, that would have been helpful.)

Here we go!

So as the forecast on December 8th, 2009 predicted ("Short-Term Dollar Strength on Worldwide Crappiness") the Euro is now within spitting distance of $1.40 to the dollar. So far so good. But the ferociousness with which it smashed though its 200 day moving average makes me inclined to wait for further weakness rather then booking profits now. I believe that the Dollar will certainly hit $1.35. Depending on the management of the Grecian crisis, the Euro easily could fall further but $1.35 is a recurring motif I feel comfortable with.
(It was the exchange rate when I first started paying attention to the markets in 2005, it was the rate just before the panic began in late July 2007, and there has been a lot of congestion around $1.35 over the past year.)












In other news, readers of this blog will note that I have been pretty bearish throughout the past year. Not to the point of outright shorting the S&P 500, but certainly not holding any long U.S. equity positions either. The theme since December 6th, 2008 has been to pursue a simple "reflationary" strategy, with a diversified portfolio split between base metals (LD, +141%), rare metals (1211.HK, +524%), junk-bonds (PHDAX , 46%), Brazilian and Indian Equities (EWZ, +156%, INP, +129%), and Inflation-Protected Government Bonds (TIP, +11%). This strategy was intended to be long only, with a "buy on dips" mentality.

I believe it is time to close out this portfolio and move to cash. Investor bullishness is the highest its been since 2006. China is removing liquidity. The VIX is near its 3-year lows and Junk-Bonds have returned to yields not seen since the moments before the panic in July 2007.

We may be moving into a new phase of the crisis. The big story of the Panic of 2008 was the run on the "cyber" banks, the money-market accounts where investors park their cash. The sudden withdrawal of cash from these accounts after the Primary Reserve fund "broke the buck" ushered in a wave of forced selling as money-market accounts sold their investment holdings to meet redemptions. We are unlikely to see a liquidity panic of this sort again. It is likely that the troubles in Europe will spread in unexpected ways. The specter of a Greek sovereign default will seriously undermine faith in the European Monetary Union, and until there is a clear protocol for dealing with the Greek crisis, we may very well see a solvency panic of the sort which accompanied the failure of Lehman Brothers.

I am not suggesting that this crisis is imminent, simply that the December 6th, 2008 portfolio reallocation has made stunning, one-in-a-lifetime returns, and there is enough uncertainty to the outlook to take a breather and reflect.

I am a firm believer that equity investors must be burned three times before a true bull market can begin. I've never read this anywhere, it simply seems like a prerequisite to the necessary capitulation which allows assets values to reach appropriate valuations for the onset of a bull market. I mark the bursting of the tech bubble as burn #1 and the panic of '08 as burn #2.

As a corollary to this thought however, I would reiterate my comments of last spring. The questions regarding L, W, or V shaped recoveries are misplaced. With the increasing globalization of the world financial markets and the shifting demographic patterns between developing and developed markets, I believe we will see a W-shaped recovery in the 1st world and a V-shaped recovery in Brazil and India.

We may very well be approaching half-time in this (so far) three year long bear market. Don't let anyone try to fool you into thinking otherwise.

Sovereign Default Swaps and Corporate Risk Premiums

The price of insuring the European Union against a member's default rose above the price to insure Europe's companies against default today for the first time since the height of the financial crisis in March 2009.

Meanwhile, the risk premium to own the riskiest safe corporate bonds instead of 30 year government bonds (and their "risk free" rate of return), has narrowed to the smallest spread since July 2007... the moment just before the panic began.

Debt Deflation : The Echo of Inflation

When one spends using credit and the interest rate on that debt is hiked, (arbitrarily to 29.99% in my case) it is the same as a sudden burst of price inflation on every good that one has ever bought with that credit.

It is almost like a strong echo.

This has been happening nationwide ever since the passage of the new consumer finance laws last fall. While the rules are excellent in many ways, they also severely restrict a bank's ability to price risk appropriately. They also have the effect of modifying, in a sense, the contracts that govern credit card master trusts- one of the securitization vehicles that made credit so cheap over the past decade. This dramatic change in their financial architecture has happened without the underlying contracts being strictly violated. The foundations of their profitability, however, been shaken, and since these trusts a revolving this may have caused a profound shift in their desirability as investments. This marks a permanent shift in the credit landscape, partially ameliorated by this recent skulduggery, but likely to have continuing consequences as new credit issuance is restricted to consumers and small businesses.

The jacking up of interest rates on everyone's credit card balances will prove to be highly deflationary. We will see the effects of this disgraceful practice by May.